ReviewCells2026
Application of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Their Exosomes in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Lysosomal Storage Diseases.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic platform for central nervous system disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases and lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs). This review examines MSC mechanisms of action-paracrine activity, immunomodulation, antioxidant effects, TFEB-mediated autophagy regulation, and enzymatic cross-correction in LSDs-while critically assessing translational challenges. We provide a comparative analysis of MSC sources, administration routes, dosing regimens, and safety profiles, with emphasis on hemocompatibility and thrombotic risks. The evidence base for MSC efficacy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, and LSDs is systematically reviewed, highlighting both promising signals and limitations. MSC-derived extracellular vesicles are discussed as a cell-free alternative with improved safety and potential blood-brain barrier interaction. We propose an individualized monitoring framework integrating clinical scales, biomarkers, and neuroimaging. Despite preclinical promise, the field faces major hurdles: product standardization, optimal dosing, and the need for large, randomized controlled trials. The most rational path forward lies in combination strategies-MSCs as adjuncts to gene or enzyme replacement therapy-and engineered platforms for sustained delivery. This review provides a roadmap for translational decision-making and identifies critical gaps that must be addressed before MSC-based therapies can be integrated into routine neurological practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.