ReviewCells2026
Context-Dependent cGAS-STING Activation Shapes Metastatic Progression and Dormancy.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer cells survive, proliferate, and metastasize in part because the immune system fails to detect and eliminate them. Moreover, the tumor microenvironment (TME) that surrounds the tumor supports cancer cell survival and resistance to chemo- and immunotherapies by inhibiting antitumor immune responses and thereby reducing the efficacy of immunotherapeutic interventions. cGAS-STING signaling senses cytoplasmic DNA and coordinates innate immune responses that shape tumor-intrinsic outcomes and the TME. Emerging evidence reveals a context-dependent, dualistic role for cGAS-STING in metastatic progression and cancer dormancy. Acute, robust activation in antigen-presenting cells promotes type I interferon responses, leading to suppression of tumor growth. By contrast, chronic, low-level cancer-intrinsic STING signaling can engage inflammatory programs that foster immune suppression and therapy resistance. Dormant disseminated tumor cells exploit niche cues to downregulate STING signaling and evade immune detection, whereas reactivation of dormant cells often involves restoration of STING activity that can promote immune elimination. In this article, we review mechanisms linking genome instability and cytoplasmic DNA to STING activation, summarize evidence for tumor-suppressive versus tumor-promoting functions across metastatic niches, and discuss how STING agonists and combination strategies may be optimized to maximize antitumor immunity while avoiding protumorigenic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.