ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Forensic Approach to Perioperative Deaths After Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, approximately three hundred million individuals undergo non-cardiac surgery each year. Perioperative mortality results from a complex interplay between patient-related factors and procedural variables, including both surgical and anesthetic aspects. Although cardiac surgery has a well-established risk profile for acute cardiovascular events, major non-cardiac surgery also carries significant-yet often underrecognized-cardiovascular risks. Approximately half of postoperative deaths following non-cardiac procedures are attributable to cardiovascular complications. Surgical and anesthetic stress responses may induce myocardial injury through several pathophysiological mechanisms. However, the absence of a universally accepted definition of perioperative myocardial injury complicates both diagnosis and management. Furthermore, these injuries frequently occur without symptoms, making them clinically silent and often undetected. Consequently, unexpected postoperative deaths may occur and may lead to allegations of medical malpractice. We conducted a narrative review of existing literature on perioperative myocardial injury and its implications for forensic investigation and medico-legal assessment. This paper highlights the importance of a comprehensive forensic evaluation of perioperative deaths, integrating clinical documentation, autopsy findings, histopathological evidence and ancillary investigations to support accurate medico-legal assessment, recognizing that no single element is sufficient to establish the cause of death in all cases. Four illustrative case studies are presented to demonstrate the medico-legal challenges associated with these events. A structured forensic investigation is essential for accurately determining the cause of death and for distinguishing preventable medical errors from unavoidable adverse outcomes within the context of complex perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.