ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Guselkumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanism, Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Positioning.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), thereby preventing IL-23 binding to the IL-23 receptor. IL-23 is a key driver of immune dysregulation and chronic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), making selective IL-23 inhibition an established therapeutic strategy in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Guselkumab is the most recently approved IL-23p19 inhibitor for the treatment of both major forms of IBD. It is the first IL-23p19 inhibitor to offer a fully subcutaneous induction regimen, and preliminary phase III data has suggested potential benefits for patients with perianal Crohn's disease. In registrational trials, there were significant improvements across multiple clinical and endoscopic endpoints in comparison to ustekinumab, although these trials were not powered for formal superiority testing. This narrative review summarises the biological rationale for IL-23 blockade, reviews the available clinical evidence, discusses practical considerations for its use, and considers its place in the landscape of IBD treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.