ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Clinical Evolution, Outcomes, and Emerging Preservation Technologies in Pancreas and Islet Transplantation.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically regarded as competitive modalities, pancreas and islet transplantation are increasingly recognized as complementary approaches to beta-cell replacement therapy. While whole-organ pancreas transplantation remains the established gold standard, islet transplantation has transitioned into an effective clinical alternative for selected cohorts of patients suffering from type 1 diabetes. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical evolution characterizing these therapeutic modalities, tracing the shift from static cold storage (SCS) toward innovative dynamic preservation technologies, and exploring potential markers for predicting clinical outcomes. A focus on immunosuppression in islet transplantation is provided, emphasizing precise, tolerance-inducing strategies and investigating costimulation blockade, regulatory T-cell (Treg)-based therapies, and biomaterial-enabled local immunoprotection, with the aim of facilitating long-term graft survival while mitigating the metabolic and renal toxicities secondary to chronic calcineurin inhibitor exposure. Current evidence related to the transition from conventional SCS to advanced perfusion platforms, namely hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), oxygenated hypothermic perfusion (HOPE), normothermic ex vivo perfusion (NEVP), and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is examined: the literature suggests that dynamic pancreas preservation platforms may improve metabolic recovery and some islet isolation outcomes; however, evidence that HOPE specifically reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury and consistently increases islet yield in the pancreas remains limited. Although normothermic perfusion provides significant utility for real-time viability assessment and graft reconditioning, its widespread clinical implementation remains constrained by technical impediments, notably interstitial edema. Ultimately, preservation efficacy is conceptualized not merely as a discrete preservation option, but as a multidimensional construct integrating biological integrity, graft usability, and recipient clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.