Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42739864›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

An Update on Osmotherapy in Acute Brain Injury: Current and Emerging Strategies.

Sarah A Howson, Benjamin Reddi, Rebecca J Hood, Renée J Turner, Mark P Plummer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah A HowsonCentral Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-0164
Benjamin ReddiCentral Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-3903-6293
Rebecca J HoodCollege of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7485-4883
Renée J TurnerCollege of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Mark P PlummerCentral Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9640-1911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial hypertension is a major modifiable pathway of secondary brain injury after acute neurological insults. Osmotherapy is an early cornerstone of tiered intracranial pressure management. Hypertonic saline and mannitol reliably reduce intracranial pressure through osmotic reduction in brain water, with additional haemodynamic and rheological effects. However, neither agent has shown consistent improvement in survival or long-term neurological recovery. Current practice is therefore guided by physiological rather than patient-centred outcomes. This review summarises the physiological basis, clinical evidence, and practical limitations of conventional osmotherapy, and explores investigational chloride-free osmotherapies including sodium lactate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium ascorbate, and sodium acetate. Chloride-free therapies aim to preserve sodium-driven osmotic efficacy while reducing chloride exposure or targeting metabolic and oxidative pathways implicated in secondary brain injury. At present, evidence is limited to small physiological trials, retrospective cohort studies, and mechanistic human studies. Future progress requires large collaborative trials that combine pragmatic treatment comparisons with multimodal neuromonitoring, biochemical safety endpoints and patient-centred outcomes.

Indexed as

cerebral oedemahypertonic salineintracranial hypertensionintracranial pressuremannitolneurocritical careosmotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42739864
PMCPMC13566536

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.