ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
An Update on Osmotherapy in Acute Brain Injury: Current and Emerging Strategies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial hypertension is a major modifiable pathway of secondary brain injury after acute neurological insults. Osmotherapy is an early cornerstone of tiered intracranial pressure management. Hypertonic saline and mannitol reliably reduce intracranial pressure through osmotic reduction in brain water, with additional haemodynamic and rheological effects. However, neither agent has shown consistent improvement in survival or long-term neurological recovery. Current practice is therefore guided by physiological rather than patient-centred outcomes. This review summarises the physiological basis, clinical evidence, and practical limitations of conventional osmotherapy, and explores investigational chloride-free osmotherapies including sodium lactate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium ascorbate, and sodium acetate. Chloride-free therapies aim to preserve sodium-driven osmotic efficacy while reducing chloride exposure or targeting metabolic and oxidative pathways implicated in secondary brain injury. At present, evidence is limited to small physiological trials, retrospective cohort studies, and mechanistic human studies. Future progress requires large collaborative trials that combine pragmatic treatment comparisons with multimodal neuromonitoring, biochemical safety endpoints and patient-centred outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.