ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Three-Dimensional Surface Topography for Entropy-Based Comparison of Sagittal Postural Classifications in Children.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensor-based three-dimensional surface topography provides non-invasive quantitative measurements of sagittal spinal alignment, but categorical posture profiles also depend on the thresholds and category structure used to transform continuous measurements. This cross-sectional methodological study compared an operationalised five-category classification with the nine-type Wilczyński typology using the same sensor-derived thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis measurements obtained with the DIERS Formetric III 4D rasterstereographic system. A total of 952 children aged 10-12 years (478 girls, 474 boys) were assessed. Category distributions were summarised descriptively, cross-classified in a 9 × 5 contingency table, and evaluated using Cramér's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.