Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740151›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Graph Topology-Guided Multi-Task Learning for Fall Detection.

Xiangtao Zhao, Peilin Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiangtao ZhaoCollege of Information Science and Technology (College of Cyber Science and Technology), Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.ORCID 0009-0007-0950-3922
Peilin JinCollege of Information Science and Technology (College of Cyber Science and Technology), Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1807-4572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fall detection faces challenges of visual occlusions and scale variations in complex multi-person scenarios. To address these issues, this paper proposes MTC-DETR, an end-to-end multi-task collaborative detection framework. After a feature extraction backbone, MTC-DETR builds a Dynamic Scale-Routing and Task-Tuning Encoder to adapt to scale variations, which integrates Deformable Large-Kernel Attention for intra-scale long-range feature enhancement and Dynamic Cross-Scale Fusion and Task-Aware Dispatch for adaptive multi-scale aggregation and task-specific feature calibration. Then, a Topology-Guided Dual-Branch Decoder is designed for object detection and keypoint detection. The Topology-Guided Local-Global Synergistic Attention reconstructs occluded keypoints via multi-hop graph convolutions, and the cross-branch pose prior guides Deformable Cross-Attention sampling in the object detection branch to enhance the localization robustness. Finally, a Homoscedastic Uncertainty Dynamic Joint Loss is introduced to resolve gradient conflicts during multi-task optimization. Experimental results show that MTC-DETR achieves mAP@0.5 scores of 92.7%, 88.9%, and 90.4% on the CAUCAFall, DiverseFall10500, and MT-Fall datasets, respectively. The proposed framework outperforms 14 state-of-the-art methods, proving its robustness and potential for real-world fall detection applications. The model was deployed on the Leju Kuavo 5 Robot. Experimental results from the deployment demonstrate that the model achieves an inference speed of 44.2 FPS (INT8) on an edge computing platform, meeting the real-time requirements for fall detection.

Indexed as

fall detectiongraph topology priormulti-task learningocclusion robustnessRT-DETR

Identifiers

PMID42740151
PMCPMC13568019

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.