ReviewMicrobiologyOpen2026
Insights Into the Antibiofilm Activity of Carbon Quantum Dots Against a Panel of Different Microorganisms: A Review.
Review in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofilm-associated infections account for a majority of chronic bacterial diseases. These infections also present a therapeutic challenge due to their intrinsic tolerance to conventional antibiotics. Carbon dots (CDs) have emerged as a versatile nanoplatform with the potential to combat these resilient structures. This review critically evaluates the burgeoning field of CD-based antibiofilm agents. We move beyond a catalog of studies to analyze how the physicochemical properties of CDs dictate their mechanisms of action against a panel of microorganisms. The antibiofilm activity of CDs is multi-sided, stemming from their ability to (1) electrostatically interact with and disrupt the biofilm matrix and bacterial cell envelopes, (2) penetrate deep into biofilms due to their ultrasmall size, (3) generate ROS that degrade the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) and kill embedded cells, and (4) downregulate key genes involved in quorum sensing and biofilm formation. An analysis of the literature reveals an efficacy bias towards Gram-positive bacteria, highlighting the barrier posed by the outer membrane of Gram-negative pathogens. We dissect how synthetic strategies and surface passivation techniques (e.g., with cationic polymers, lysozyme, or targeting ligands) are being deployed to overcome these challenges. While CDs represent a frontier in antibiofilm therapy, the field faces hurdles, including a lack of standardized testing protocols, limited in vivo validation, and unresolved questions about toxicity. This review identifies these critical gaps and proposes future research directions focused on the rational design of next-generation CDs with enhanced specificity, potency, and translational potential for treating recalcitrant biofilm infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.