ArticleJournal of periodontology2026
New technologies in oral reconstructive medicine: Consensus report of the AAP/OF/SEPA Workshop.
Article in Journal of periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
42 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objectives of this Workshop were to evaluate the efficacy of scaffolding technologies for horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation; to evaluate the efficacy of substitute scaffolds for soft tissue augmentation in the context of implant therapy; to evaluate the efficacy of cells and/or biologics combined with scaffolds for alveolar bone regeneration; to evaluate the efficacy of cells and/or biologics combined with scaffolds for soft tissue regeneration in the context of implant therapy; and to evaluate emerging technologies and personalized strategies for improving hard and/or soft tissue defects around natural teeth and dental implants.
methodsThe Workshop discussions were informed by five specifically commissioned systematic reviews from the following three Working Groups: Working Group 1 - Use of scaffolds for bone and soft tissue regeneration; Working Group 2 - Use of cells and/or biologics combined with scaffolds for hard and soft tissue regeneration; and Working Group 3 - Current, emerging, and personalized approaches for periodontal and peri-implant tissue regeneration. The Workshop participants were informed by the compiled evidence from the five systematic reviews within each Working Group to address pertinent issues to inform clinical practice, research, and the public community.
resultsThe consensus among the Workshop group participants was that cellular therapies and biologics, alone and in combination with scaffolding technologies, offer strong potential in regenerating tissues around teeth and dental implants. There was variability in treatment outcomes depending on the overall evidence and the efficacy of these technologies, as well as on the specific defects and patient-based constraints. The consensus report detailed the results and implications of the findings, demonstrating the value of these technologies in improving clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
conclusionsCurrent regenerative approaches lead to long-term stable outcomes at natural teeth as well as dental implant sites; novel technologies can benefit patients by enhancing longer-term stability of teeth and implants to promote the health of the oral cavity and dentition; and artificial intelligence-enabled modeling can contribute to the identification of relevant features at the individual (as opposed to population) level, empowering patients to be active participants in their journeys and improving science-to-public communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.