SynthesisActa odontologica Scandinavica2026
Radiographic assessment and orthodontic intervention effects on orthodontically induced root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Synthesis in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relative contribution of radiographic methods and characteristics of the orthodontic intervention to orthodontically induced root resorption (OIRR) remains unknown. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to (1) estimate the pooled OIRR effect across orthodontic intervention versus comparator contrasts, (2) compare pooled estimates by radiographic method (2D [two-dimensional] vs. 3D/CBCT [three-dimensional/cone-beam computed tomography]), and (3) explore whether force mechanics (intrusive versus nonintrusive) modified OIRR magnitude. Seven randomized controlled trials and one prospective study (January 2010-October 2025) were included. Only OIRR was the outcome, reported as correlation coefficients (r). The primary analysis combined within-study intervention-versus-comparator estimates. Subgroup analysis of 2D versus 3D/CBCT imaging was prespecified, whereas post-hoc analysis of intrusive versus nonintrusive mechanics was performed. The pooled analysis for the primary outcome showed a small, nonsignificant OIRR effect (r = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.12 to 0.27; p = 0.372) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 84.0%). Radiographic method did not change the pooled estimates significantly (p = 0.331). Force-mechanics analysis showed that intrusive mechanics was related to significantly higher root resorption than nonintrusive mechanics (r = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.65 versus r = -0.03; 95% CI = -0.16 to 0.10; p < 0.001). This accounted for 87.1% of the between-study variance. The average orthodontic intervention effect on OIRR was small and not significant; however, the OIRR magnitude was strongly affected by force mechanics, particularly by intrusive forces. There was no significant difference in pooled estimates by radiographic method; however, 3D/CBCT provides superior volumetric quantification and should be used judiciously according ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.