Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740607›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2026

Pangenome analysis reveals both niche-specific "specialists" and microbial "side hustlers" in colorectal cancer microbiomes.

Justin Lee, Samuel Minot, Neelendu Dey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin LeeCreighton School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Samuel MinotCirro Bio, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Neelendu DeyMicrobiome Research Initiative, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8825-5689

Funding

Understanding adenoma progression: Interplay among tissue microenvironment, clonal architecture, and gut microbiomeU54CA274374 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Neelendu Dey · 2022 to 2026
$10.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA274374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiome is reproducibly implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the inter-study and interpersonal variability of certain species associations suggests that CRC microbiomes may be defined by convergent functional states achievable by phylogenetically diverse organisms. Distinguishing lineage-conserved "specialists" from taxonomically diverse "side hustlers"-organisms whose shared functional traits are dispersed across phylogenetically distant lineages-offers complementary translational insights: "specialists" are primary candidates for lineage-targeted biomarkers and inhibitors, while the shared functional architecture of "side hustlers" may reveal high-priority potential therapeutic targets robust to inter-individual variability. Here, we quantify phylogenetic coherence (monophyly) of 3,711 co-associated gene bins (CAGs) across 13 bacterial species and evaluate CRC associations across three independent cohorts, identifying hundreds of CAGs associated with CRC or health across a spectrum of monophyly scores, indicating that both states harbor a mixture of "specialist" and "side hustler" gene content. Strikingly, in

Indexed as

BacteriaColorectal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansPhylogenycancer preventionColorectal cancergut microbiomemetagenomicsmicrobial biomarkerpangenomes

Identifiers

PMID42740607
PMCPMC13580483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.