ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2026
Current Practice in the Diagnosis and Management of
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMacrolide-resistant
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted among Korean pediatricians, including general pediatricians and subspecialists in September 2024. The survey assessed diagnostic methods, antibiotic choices, corticosteroid use, and factors influencing treatment decisions.
resultsA total of 452 pediatricians participated in the survey. Polymerase chain reaction was the preferred diagnostic method (92.0%), although serologic tests were also commonly used (37.4%). Macrolides were the dominant first-line treatment (89.0%), with clarithromycin and roxithromycin being equally favored. Doxycycline was the most frequent second-line choice (67.0%). Corticosteroid use varied among specialties, with up to 94% of respondents using them occasionally or almost always. Treatment guidelines were the primary factor influencing antibiotic choices (76.5% for first-line, 59.7% for second-line).
conclusionThis study reveals diverse practices and a need for standardized guidelines in managing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.