Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42740758›Full record

GuidelineRespiratory research & clinical practice2026

Brazilian guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Official document of the Brazilian Thoracic Society based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.

Veronica Moreira Amado, Mônica Corso Pereira, Ricardo Amorim Correa, Frederico A F Thadeu Campos, Caio Fernandes, Eloara V M Ferreira, Marcelo B Gazzana, Marcelo Jorge Jacó Rocha, Carlos Jardim, Jose Leonidas Alves-Jr and 7 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Respiratory research & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Veronica Moreira Amado. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília - UNB - Brasília (DF) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4253-4935
Mônica Corso Pereira. Serviço de Pneumologia, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-7669-4841
Ricardo Amorim Correa. Medicina Interna/Divisão de Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1779-0443
Frederico A F Thadeu Campos. Instituto Pequenas Missionárias de Maria Imaculada/Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-2343
Caio Fernandes. Unidade de Circulação Pulmonar, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-4912-021X
Eloara V M Ferreira. Divisão de Doenças Respiratórias, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Unifesp - São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-6473
Marcelo B Gazzana. Serviço de Pneumologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-1890
Marcelo Jorge Jacó Rocha. Hospital de Messejana Dr Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes, Fortaleza (CE) Brasil.ORCID 0009-0003-5441-9990
Carlos Jardim. Unidade de Circulação Pulmonar, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-0425-5548
Jose Leonidas Alves-Jr. Unidade de Circulação Pulmonar, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-1947
Rudolf K F Oliveira. Divisão de Doenças Respiratórias, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Unifesp - São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2252-8119
Virginia Pacheco. Instituto Pequenas Missionárias de Maria Imaculada/Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9557-4917
William Salibe-Filho. Unidade de Circulação Pulmonar, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2199-9525
Suzana Tanni. Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP - Botucatu (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2587-2759
Daniel Waetge. Departamento de Clínica Médica, Divisão de Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-1126
Jaquelina S Ota-Arakaki. Divisão de Doenças Respiratórias, Hospital São Paulo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Unifesp - São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-7679
Rogerio Souza. Unidade de Circulação Pulmonar, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2789-9143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complex and heterogeneous clinical condition associated with high morbidity and mortality and can occur in the context of various diseases. It is characterized by increased pulmonary arterial pressure and progressive right ventricular overload. The current classification of the different forms of PH presentation comprises five groups, based on pathophysiological similarities and available therapeutic options. In recent decades, significant advances in pathophysiological understanding and the development of specific therapies have significantly modified the prognosis of patients with PH. This guideline aims to define updated Brazilian recommendations for the treatment of PH, with an emphasis on pulmonary arterial hypertension, considering the available scientific evidence and the particularities of the Brazilian health system. Four structured questions in the PICO format (patients, intervention, comparator group, and outcome) were developed by a multidisciplinary panel of Brazilian experts. Systematic literature reviews were conducted for each question, based on randomized clinical trials. Meta-analyses were conducted where methodologically feasible. The quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were defined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The guideline was complemented by a comprehensive narrative review of the literature on clinical management of patients with PH, especially patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, addressing general measures, specific therapeutic strategies, risk stratification, and treatment algorithm, always based on the best available scientific evidence and with the aim of contributing to the improvement of care for patients with PH in Brazil.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertension, PulmonarySocieties, MedicalBrazilHumansReview Literature as TopicAntihypertensive AgentsHypertension, pulmonary/classificationHypertension, pulmonary/drug therapyPulmonary arterial hypertension/drug therapy

Identifiers

PMID42740758
PMCPMC13568801

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.