ArticleERJ open research2026
Perspectives of primary care and community clinicians on chronic breathlessness management.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic breathlessness is a prevalent and debilitating symptom affecting people with chronic respiratory disease. However, community management of chronic breathlessness is limited. Further research is needed to determine how breathlessness care can best be delivered in primary care, identify knowledge and training gaps, and determine what resources might support such a model. This study explored the perspectives of Australian primary and community care clinicians regarding the management of chronic breathlessness, including barriers and facilitators to symptom-directed care. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with clinicians from primary care and community settings within Australia. Data were analysed using a deductive thematic approach. Results: 16 participants from diverse practice settings and roles were recruited from southern and eastern Australia. Five key themes emerged regarding community management of chronic breathlessness: invisibility; uncertainty, inflexibility and discomfort; roles and engagement with care; information and communication; and health systems and structures. Participants identified under-recognition, under-reporting and inappropriate normalisation of breathlessness as barriers to management, and physical, diagnostic and financial barriers that limited patient access to healthcare. Participants expressed interest in a targeted education programme focusing on assessment and management of chronic breathlessness, and indicated a willingness to engage in such professional development opportunities. Conclusions: Managing chronic breathlessness is a complex task, characterised by several patient-, clinician- and system-related barriers that hinder effective clinical care. Primary care and community clinicians described significant challenges in managing chronic breathlessness, and desire education and support to better help people with this debilitating symptom.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.