Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42741808›Full record

ReviewJournal of texture studies2026

Starch Selection in Sweet Food Systems: A Texture-Driven Framework Across Confectionery and Dessert Matrices.

Nazanin Pournemati, Benedicta Biyimba, Ariel Buzera, Idaresit Ekaette

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of texture studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nazanin PournematiDepartment of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.
Benedicta BiyimbaDepartment of Food Science and Agricultural Chemistry, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2691-3179
Ariel BuzeraFood Science and Technology Département, Université Evangélique en Afrique (UEA), Bukavu, Sud-Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5420-8358
Idaresit EkaetteDepartment of Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2254-9584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sweet food systems present a uniquely complex environment for starch functionality across confections, baked goods, dairy desserts, fruit-based products, and bakery fillings. The role of starch varies fundamentally between product categories; therefore, its selection and application cannot be treated as generic. The sugar-dominated matrices of these products alter starch gelatinization temperature, retrogradation tendency, and water distribution in ways that vary with sweetener identity, concentration, and molecular structure; however, real sweet food systems are inherently multicomponent, making starch behavior in these matrices substantially more complex than model-system predictions suggest. This review provides an integrated starch selection framework for sweet food formulation, analyzing functionality and modification requirements across seven major product categories: caramel and toffee, gummies and jelly candy, hard candy, cookies and biscuits, bakery fillings, jams and fruit preserves, and custards and dairy desserts. The central principle is that starch selection must be matched to the dominant failure mode of the specific matrix because no single starch type or modification approach addresses the full range of functional requirements across sweet food systems. The sugar-starch interaction is established as the mechanistic foundation for product-specific selection, with particular attention to how reformulation pressures, including sugar reduction, fat reduction, and clean-label demands, alter this interaction in ways that make conventional reference data unreliable. Recommendations are explicitly characterized as directly evidenced by product-specific studies or analytically synthesized where direct evidence is absent, transparently identifying where experimental validation remains needed. Three cross-cutting formulation challenges are critically examined: the clean-label paradox, starch-flavor binding, and the limitations of predictive models in multi-ingredient sweet food matrices.

Indexed as

CandyStarchSweetening AgentsFruitStarchSweetening Agentsmodified starchreformulationstarch functionalitysugar‐starch interactionsweet food formulation

Identifiers

PMID42741808
PMCPMC13575709

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.