Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742831›Full record

ReviewObesity surgery2026

Comparative Outcomes of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Adults with Severe Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ali Altwaheih, Feras W Atieh, Ibrahim Abdel-Jaleel, Omar Abdelghani, Mohammad G Alomari, Sondos Jallad, Nadine Abed, Hashem Altabbaa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali AltwaheihHashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5573-4524
Feras W AtiehHashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Ibrahim Abdel-JaleelPrince Hamzah Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Omar AbdelghaniPrince Hamzah Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Mohammad G AlomariHashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1536-7100
Sondos JalladHashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Nadine AbedAl-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Hashem AltabbaaAl Basheer Hospital, Amman, Jordan. hashem.altabbaa.20@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-838X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) is increasingly used for severe obesity, but its comparative effectiveness versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 12 comparative studies (3,317 patients) identified through searches of major databases to April 2026. Random-effects meta-analyses suggested a potential weight-loss benefit with SADI-S compared with RYGB at selected follow-up points, while no clear differences were observed in remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia, or in HbA1c reduction. No clear differences were observed in operative outcomes or early complications, while the findings suggested potential reductions in reoperations and selected late surgical complications with SADI-S; a nonsignificant trend toward greater calcium deficiency was also observed. Evidence certainty was predominantly low or very low because of methodological limitations and heterogeneity. Comparative mortality could not be assessed because no included study provided mortality data suitable for pooling, highlighting the need for high-quality long-term randomized studies.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryMeta-analysisRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSADI-SSevere obesity

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.