Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42742849›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2026

Social Working Memory: a Systematic Review.

Matheus Pinheiro, Jesus Landeira-Fernandez, Marcus Vinicius Alves, Thomas Eichenberg Krahe, Carlos Eduardo Nórte

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matheus PinheiroPsychology Department, Postgraduate Program in Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente, nº225, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3258-2371
Jesus Landeira-FernandezPsychology Department, Postgraduate Program in Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente, nº225, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8395-8008
Marcus Vinicius AlvesPsychology Department, Postgraduate Program in Psychobiology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-3771
Thomas Eichenberg KrahePsychology Department, Postgraduate Program in Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Marquês de São Vicente, nº225, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. tekrahe@puc-rio.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4686-9284
Carlos Eduardo NórtePsychology Institute, Postgraduate Program in Social Psychology, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier, nº524, Room 10.001E, Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. cadulsn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-5126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social Working Memory (SWM) refers to the ability to maintain and manipulate socio-cognitive information-such as others' mental states, intentions, emotions, and traits-in order to guide social interactions. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesize theoretical conceptualizations of SWM, (2) examine experimental paradigms and measurement protocols, and (3) outline future research directions. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus, following the PRISMA guidelines. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed that: (a) it is a promising construct for social neuroscience, but it still requires greater conceptual precision; (b) the most frequently used paradigm involved mentally ranking friends according to personality traits during a delay period, a task capturing both maintenance and manipulation demands of SWM; and (c) future studies should focus on the development of tasks targeting specific domains, on further exploring the neural substrates of SWM, and on clarifying its relationship with other cognitive functions. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic mapping of SWM in the literature. The findings suggest that SWM is a promising but still developing construct that requires greater conceptual precision and psychometric support. This review provides a framework for future research and methodological refinement.

Indexed as

Social cognitionSocial interactionSocial working memoryWorking memory

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.