ReviewDiscover nano2026
Next-generation microneedle patches for transdermal therapeutics and diagnostics.
Review in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microneedle patches (MNPs) have emerged as versatile platforms for minimally invasive transdermal drug delivery, biosensing, and point-of-care diagnostics by transiently breaching the stratum corneum while minimizing pain and tissue damage. Recent advances in biomaterials, microfabrication, additive manufacturing, and bioelectronics have expanded MNP functionality beyond drug delivery to include controlled therapeutic release, interstitial fluid sampling, wearable biosensing, and closed-loop therapeutic systems. However, despite substantial technological progress, clinical translation remains constrained by challenges related to manufacturing scalability, device reproducibility, standardized characterization, quality assurance, regulatory approval, and commercialization. Unlike previous reviews that primarily emphasize microneedle classifications or material platforms, this review provides a critical translational perspective by integrating materials science, engineering, manufacturing, biosensing, and regulatory considerations into a unified framework. Major fabrication strategies, material platforms, and characterization methods are systematically compared with respect to mechanical performance, manufacturability, reproducibility, and clinical applicability. Current therapeutic and diagnostic applications are critically evaluated alongside the key barriers to industrial production and regulatory implementation. Emerging opportunities, including smart biosensing, stimuli-responsive materials, additive manufacturing, and closed-loop therapeutic systems, are also discussed. By highlighting the factors that govern technology readiness and clinical implementation, this review provides practical insights for accelerating the development and commercialization of next-generation microneedle platforms for drug delivery, biosensing, vaccination, and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.