ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
AI Health Services and Health Satisfaction Across Socioeconomic Groups in South Korea: National Cross-Sectional Study Using an Instrumental Variable Approach.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: AI-enabled digital health services are rapidly expanding within health care systems and are expected to improve health management and access to health information. However, rigorous empirical evidence on whether AI health service use is associated with individual health satisfaction remains limited, particularly regarding whether these potential benefits differ across socioeconomic groups. Objective: This study aims to examine the relationship between AI health service use and health satisfaction and to assess whether this association varies across socioeconomic groups. Methods: Nationally representative data from the 2024 Digital Divide Survey in South Korea (N=15,000) were analyzed. To address potential endogeneity arising from self-selection and reverse causality, a 2-stage least squares instrumental variable approach was used. Robustness analyses using an alternative sample restriction, an alternative estimation method, and alternative instrumental variable specifications were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Subgroup analyses and interaction tests were conducted to assess socioeconomic heterogeneity. Results: AI health service use was positively and significantly associated with health satisfaction (β=0.739, 95% CI 0.391-1.088; Conclusions: AI health service use was associated with higher levels of health satisfaction, and this association appeared stronger among several socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. These findings suggest that AI health services may function as complementary health resources and highlight the importance of considering socioeconomic heterogeneity when developing and evaluating AI-enabled health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.