Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42743422›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2026

A predictive model for prudent albumin priming in cardiopulmonary bypass circuits.

Julie Fenske, Isabel Centner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julie FenskeUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7520-5110
Isabel CentnerUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDosing albumin to normalize colloid osmotic pressure is an underutilized strategy within the application of cardiopulmonary bypass. The negative sequelae of third-spacing and edema post-bypass are well known and documented within the literature, yet it is not common practice for perfusionists to calculate albumin dilution or tailor albumin administration to each individual patient.

methodsThe author explored relevant literature to justify quantifying albumin dosing and concentration within the application of cardiopulmonary bypass. Sequelae following edema in the cardiac patient were also explored and presented, justifying the investigation of this topic. Formulas to quantify albumin dilution, resultant drop in colloid osmotic pressure, and suggested albumin dosing, were presented and unified into a model.

resultsA spreadsheet-based model was developed to quantify albumin dilution that may be accessed or recreated by the reader for information purposes or for clinical use. This model enables the user to solely quantify their albumin dilution during bypass, or more proactively calculate albumin concentration and dosing in an attempt to mitigate large colloid osmotic pressure changes during bypass.

conclusionsIntentional albumin management can yield more physiologically normal albumin concentrations and colloid osmotic pressures undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, reducing the sequelae previously described. The model presented enables informed albumin dosing by the perfusionist, and use of this model may be of especially great benefit to patients who are hypovolemic, underweight, or pediatric.

Indexed as

AlbuminsCardiopulmonary BypassSerum AlbuminHumansOsmotic PressureAlbuminsSerum AlbuminAlbuminCardiopulmonary bypassColloid osmotic pressureEdemaFluid shiftOncotic pressure

Identifiers

PMID42743422
PMCPMC13577643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.