ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Quality of Life of People Living With Dementia Residing in Nursing Homes: Secondary Analysis of Observational Data.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Quality of life (QoL) plays a crucial role in dementia care; however, QoL and its dynamic, context-dependent nature can be difficult to capture among people living with dementia due to challenges in memory and communication, and limitations of self-reported QoL instruments. Observational tools such as the Maastricht Electronic Daily Life Observation (MEDLO) provide narrative descriptions of the daily life of people living with dementia in nursing homes. However, the MEDLO tool was not developed to assess QoL specifically, and it remains unclear to what extent its narrative descriptions reflect aspects of QoL. Analyzing these narrative descriptions is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Recent advances in natural language processing, including large language models (LLMs), offer the potential to analyze these narrative descriptions at scale. Objective: The study aims to explore whether an LLM can be used to structure existing MEDLO narrative data into interpretable QoL-relevant patterns in people living with dementia. Specifically, this study examines whether N-gram analysis, sentiment analysis, and LLM-based topic modeling can identify recurring language patterns, emotional tone, and semantic clusters that can be mapped to Lawton QoL domains. Methods: This study conducted a secondary analysis of existing MEDLO observational data from 151 people living with dementia residing in Dutch long-term care. Narrative data had been documented by trained observers, describing activities, interactions, settings, and emotional expressions. For analysis, a local secure pipeline was developed in which GPT-4o-mini was deployed. The pipeline comprised three analytical steps: (1) N-gram frequency analysis, (2) sentiment analysis, and (3) topic modeling. Prompts were iteratively refined through prompt engineering. Coauthors and domain experts reviewed outputs for coherence, contextual plausibility, and relevance to long-term care practice. Results: A total of 5622 narratives (50,106 words) from 151 people living with dementia were analyzed. The narratives were short, averaging 10.5 (SD 5.80) words per narrative. N-gram frequency analysis identified the frequent documentation of passive activities ( Conclusions: LLM-based analyses identified predominantly passive activities with little variation in indoor settings, while people living with dementia were often described as having positive affect. This exploratory study suggests that LLM-based analyses may help structure observational narratives into QoL-relevant patterns, but further validation is needed before such outputs can inform person-centered care practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.