ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
Changes in LDL-C levels among primary health care patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes during a 36-month follow-up.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsLow-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level is one important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of primary health care patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, or diabetes according to their LDL-C levels and to observe changes in these levels and medications during the 36-month follow-up.
methodsThis study was based on a clinical trial, conducted in a health centre in Siilinjärvi, Finland, between 2017 and 2021. A total of 507 patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, or diabetes were divided into four groups based on their baseline LDL-C levels to align with the dyslipidaemia guideline risk categories as follows: LDL-C (mmol/L) in Group 0 (< 1.4), Group 1 (1.4-1.8), Group 2 (>1.8-2.6), and Group 3 (> 2.6).
resultsThe mean age at baseline was 69 years (58% females). All patients in Groups 0 and 1 already used lipid-lowering medication. A lower LDL-C level at baseline was statistically significantly associated with higher age, lower blood pressureand lower alcohol consumption. There were changes in the pharmacologically active substances prescribed in all groups. During the 36-month follow-up, the mean LDL-C values decreased statistically significantly in group 3 (-0.76 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.90 to -0.62, -21%,
conclusionsThis study provides a perspective on real-word treatment patterns and changes in medications prescribed as the recommendations change over time. During a period of increasing pharmacotherapeutic opportunities, this study, conducted in everyday clinical practice suggests that common lipid-lowering medications (atorvastatin and rosuvastatin) are most frequently used for primary health care patients, and are associated with a significant decrease in LDL-C levels. A greater decrease was observed among patients with higher baseline LDL-C values. Despite decreases in LDL-C, this study suggests that the gap remains between guideline-recommended treatment targets and achieved LDL-C levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.