Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745301›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Dysfunctional romantic beliefs of heterosexual women undergraduate students: the role of traditional media and social media.

Gökçe Sancak Aydın

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gökçe Sancak AydınPsychological Counseling and Guidance Department, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey. gsancak.aydin@yobu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore dysfunctional romantic beliefs among women undergraduate students and the meanings they attribute to romantic messages received from traditional media and social media. Using a qualitative research design, twenty heterosexual undergraduate women participated in in-depth semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using content analysis, and findings were supported with participants' direct quotations to enhance interpretive depth.The findings indicated that participants perceived both traditional and social media as influential sources of messages about romance. While they emphasized that the content and presentation of these messages differed across media channels, they reported being consistently exposed to romantic narratives through both. At the same time, participants generally did not describe themselves as directly internalizing these messages; rather, they viewed many of the romantic relationships portrayed on social media as artificial, idealized, and inconsistent with real-life. Nevertheless, the results suggested that repeated exposure to media messages contributes to constructing romanticism as a relational necessity, potentially shaping romantic expectations in dysfunctional ways. Among the romantic beliefs identified, the strongest endorsement was for the belief in a "one and only" partner, followed by the "idealization" and the belief that "love conquers all." In contrast, the belief in "love at first sight" received the lowest level of endorsement. The findings are discussed within the broader context of gender roles and Turkish cultural norms, highlighting how media representations intersect with culturally embedded expectations surrounding romantic relationships.

Indexed as

HeterosexualityInterpersonal RelationsLoveSocial MediaStudentsAdolescentAdultDigital MediaFemaleHumansMedia ExposureQualitative ResearchTurkeyUniversitiesYoung AdultRomantic beliefsRomanticismSocial mediaTraditional mediaWomen undergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID42745301
PMCPMC13579883

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.