ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2026
Nonclinical safety assessment of SBT777101, a CAR-engineered regulatory T cell therapy for autoimmune diseases.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-regulatory T cell (Treg) therapies represent a promising approach for autoimmune diseases, but their nonclinical safety assessment remains challenging due to antigen-, disease-, and species-specific pharmacology that limits the relevance of conventional animal models. SBT777101, a CAR-Treg therapy targeting citrullinated proteins associated with rheumatoid arthritis and hidradenitis suppurativa, was evaluated using a nonclinical strategy centered on in vitro and ex vivo New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) and in vivo studies benchmarked against untransduced polyclonal Tregs, which are manufactured identically but lack the CAR and have an established clinical safety record, complemented by immunodeficient mouse studies. We hypothesized that CAR engineering would not destabilize the Treg phenotype or introduce new toxicological liabilities relative to polyclonal Tregs. SBT777101 maintained phenotypic stability under repeated stimulation and proinflammatory conditions, produced minimal proinflammatory cytokines following activation, and demonstrated immunomodulatory activity comparable to untransduced Tregs. Tissue cross-reactivity and primary cell studies identified limited membrane-associated binding, no evidence of CAR-mediated cytotoxicity or activation in normal human tissues, and no off-target binding by broad protein array screening. Immunosuppressive activity toward natural killer and CD8+ T cell responses was limited and comparable to polyclonal Tregs. Lentiviral integration site analyses demonstrated polyclonal integration profiles without evidence of transformation or abnormal growth in a cytokine- and activation-independent growth assay. This study establishes a combined in vivo and NAM-based nonclinical safety framework for CAR-Treg therapies and demonstrates that CAR engineering of SBT777101 does not introduce new safety liabilities relative to unmodified polyclonal Tregs. These findings supported progression of SBT777101 into Phase 1 clinical trials and offer a generalizable approach for evaluating the safety of future CAR-Treg therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.