ReviewNeuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology2026
Non-Meningothelial Mesenchymal Tumor of the Central Nervous System: Case Report and Literature Review.
Review in Neuropathology : official journal of the Japanese Society of Neuropathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-meningothelial mesenchymal tumors (NMMTs) of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare and diagnostically challenging neoplasms. Although World Health Organization (WHO) updates have incorporated molecularly defined entities, a subset of tumors remains difficult to classify because of overlapping morphology, nonspecific immunophenotype, and absence of canonical gene fusions. We report a supratentorial NMMT tumor in a 40-year-old man presenting with progressive left-sided paresthesia. Neuroimaging demonstrated a parasagittal mass. Following gross total resection, histological examination revealed a predominantly myxoid proliferation with focal cortical and dural infiltration. Immunohistochemistry was noncontributory, showing focal CD99 expression. Fluorescence in situ hybridization excluded EWSR1, FUS, and CIC rearrangements. Extended RNA-based next-generation sequencing identified a putative low-confidence SHISA5::BRAF fusion. This case illustrates the persistent diagnostic complexity of NMMTs despite integrated histological and molecular evaluation. The absence of canonical alterations not only complicates classification but also contributes to uncertainty regarding prognosis and optimal therapeutic strategies. Emerging evidence suggests that a subset of these tumors may be driven by alternative oncogenic mechanisms, including MAPK pathway activation beyond currently recognized fusion-defined entities. In this context, the identification of a putative SHISA5::BRAF fusion expands the molecular spectrum of these neoplasms, although its functional relevance remains uncertain. These challenges underscore the need for cautious long-term follow-up and individualized multidisciplinary management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.