ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2026
From signal to construct evidence: multimodal consumer-wearable sensing in real general-aviation flight.
Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We asked how far multimodal consumer-wearable signals recorded during real general-aviation flight can be treated as construct-relevant measurement rather than as records of motion, posture, or task structure. Forty pilots flew five standardized maneuvers in a Cessna 172 while frontal electroencephalography (EEG and AF7/AF8), cardiac activity, electrodermal activity (EDA), eye movements, skin temperature, and flight dynamics were recorded, with segments paired with pilot self-reports and the four in-air maneuvers additionally paired with instructor competency ratings. We assembled three nested tiers of evidence, namely, known-groups sensitivity, within-person convergent evidence, and criterion-related association, and then tested prediction in held-out pilots. Signal quality supported inference, with trial-level availability from 85% to 97%. Self-reported stress varied across maneuvers (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.