ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Spatial immune biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer: emerging evidence, technology trade-offs, and barriers to clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an immunogenic but clinically heterogeneous breast cancer subtype. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), PD-L1 expression, and tumor mutational burden provide useful but incomplete summaries of the tumor immune microenvironment. Spatial immune biomarkers retain tissue architecture and ask where immune cells are located, which cells they contact, and whether local neighborhoods are inflamed, excluded, suppressive, or organized into tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS). In this critical review, we examine CD8+ T-cell proximity, stromal versus intratumoral localization, suppressive myeloid and regulatory T-cell (Treg)-rich niches, TLS maturity, and spatial checkpoint co-expression in TNBC. We also compare multiplex immunofluorescence, multiplexed ion beam imaging by time-of-flight (MIBI-TOF), imaging mass cytometry, spatial transcriptomics, and hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E)-based artificial intelligence in terms of spatial resolution, molecular depth, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) compatibility, scalability, reproducibility, and clinical feasibility. Most reported associations with prognosis or treatment response remain retrospective or exploratory, and their definitions are sensitive to sampling, segmentation, and threshold selection. The most clinically interpretable candidates are compartment-aware TIL measures, CD8+ T-cell-tumor proximity, and TLS-related features, but none is ready to guide treatment independently. Progress will require locked biomarker definitions, multisite analytical validation, external cohorts, and prospective trials with pre-specified spatial endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.