Trial reportCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Accelerated Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation for the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Study With Six-Month Follow-Up.
Trial report in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (a-iTBS) is a novel rTMS protocol increasingly used for mental disorders, but its application in alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains early. This exploratory sham-controlled study evaluated a 50-session a-iTBS protocol for AUD.
methodsSixty-one male AUD inpatients were randomized to receive traditional iTBS (once daily, 600 pulse/session), a-iTBS (5 sessions/day, 3000 pulses/day), or sham iTBS. Treatments were administered on 10 weekdays (Monday to Friday over 2 weeks) and targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The primary outcome was the change in craving. The alcohol relapse behavior, emotional symptoms, and sleep quality were evaluated pre-/post-intervention.
resultsGroup showed no significant main effect on craving percentage change. The a-iTBS group showed a higher response rate and earlier response onset than the s-iTBS group, whereas no significant differences existed between a-iTBS and iTBS, or iTBS and s-iTBS. No intergroup differences were detected for mood and sleep indicators. At the 6-month follow-up, participants receiving a-iTBS achieved longer abstinence duration than those given s-iTBS. Exploratory logistic regression indicated that baseline GAD-7 scores and treatment group were associated with treatment response.
conclusionsAlthough the primary craving outcome did not differ significantly among groups, a-iTBS showed preliminary signals of earlier response and longer time to first relapse than sham stimulation. These exploratory findings require confirmation in larger trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.