ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Early deep response to cilta-cel as 2nd CAR T-Cell therapy after CELMoD-based bridging for advanced multiple myeloma.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AbstractChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as an innovative and highly effective treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This effect is based on redirecting modified T-cells towards plasma cells expressing target antigens, specifically B cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Despite high initial response rates, disease relapse remains a major clinical challenge. Therapeutic options after progression following prior BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy are limited, and prognosis is often poor. We report on a 58-year-old male with high-risk IgA kappa multiple myeloma who was heavily pretreated and received idecabtagene vicleucel as sixth-line therapy, achieving a deep response lasting for approximately one year. Following disease progression, the patient received bridging therapy with mezigdomide,carfilzomib, and dexamethasone, followed by a second BCMA-directed CAR T-cell infusion using ciltacabtagene autoleucel. Previous whole genome sequencing had confirmed preserved BCMA expression.Early post-infusion assessment showed a rapid and profound response, with marked declines in serum IgA and free kappa light chains, accompanied by robust CAR T-cell expansion. Treatment-related toxicities were manageable, including grade II cytokine release syndrome and prolonged cytopenias, without evidence of neurotoxicity.This case provides additional knowledge that retreatment with BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy may be feasible and clinically effective in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma, particularly after a durable response to initial CAR T-cell therapy. Bridging therapy and the use of an alternative CAR T-cell construct may further improve outcomes. Prospective studies are needed to define optimal patient selection and treatment sequencing in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.