Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747694›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2026

The Glymphatic System in Neurological Diseases: Mechanisms, Imaging Surrogates, and Translational Uncertainties.

Ahmed Sami Raihane, Mario Di Napoli, Denis Bragin, Eder Cáceres, Michael M Ortiz, Marina N Moore, Afshin A Divani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed Sami RaihaneSchool of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-7758
Mario Di NapoliNeurological Service, dell'Annunziata Hospital, Sulmona, L'Aquila, Italy.
Denis BraginDepartment of Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Eder CáceresUnisabana Center for Translational Science, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.
Michael M OrtizSchool of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Marina N MooreSchool of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Afshin A DivaniDepartment of Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. adivani@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-0758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review critically synthesizes mechanistic, imaging, and clinical evidence on the glymphatic system in neurological disease. It distinguishes direct tracer-based observations from indirect imaging surrogates and identifies the principal uncertainties that currently limit clinical translation. RECENT

findingsThe glymphatic framework describes glia-associated perivascular routes that support exchange between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid and contribute to solute transport in experimental models. Rodent studies show that aquaporin-4 polarization, vascular pulsatility, and sleep state modulate tracer movement, but the relative contribution of convection, diffusion, and alternative clearance pathways remains debated. Sleep-wake state alters interstitial or CSF concentrations of amyloid-beta and tau; however, these changes reflect both clearance and activity-dependent production or release. Meningeal lymphatic vessels interact anatomically and functionally with CSF drainage pathways in preclinical models, whereas direct evidence for an integrated glymphatic-meningeal circuit in humans remains limited. Most human disease studies use cross-sectional or longitudinal associations derived from indirect imaging markers rather than direct measurements of glymphatic flow. Intrathecal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging provides a tracer-based assessment of CSF influx, distribution, and clearance to cervical lymph nodes. Diffusion tensor imaging along the perivascular space assesses water movement in the perivascular spaces, and phase-contrast MRI quantifies pulsatile CSF velocity and volume; both are noninvasive sequences. MRI-visible perivascular spaces, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and CSF-hemodynamic coupling are indirect or partially overlapping measures of perivascular fluid biology. No noninvasive biomarker has yet been validated as a direct measure of human glymphatic flow. Candidate interventions including sleep-directed strategies, photobiomodulation, respiratory entrainment, gamma-frequency sensory stimulation, neuromodulation, and pharmacological approaches, remain preclinical or early mechanistic, and none has improved patient-important neurological outcomes through a validated glymphatic mechanism.

Indexed as

Glymphatic SystemNervous System DiseasesAnimalsCerebrospinal FluidHumansNeuroimagingTranslational Research, BiomedicalAquaporin-4DTI-ALPSGlymphatic systemNeurodegenerationPerivascular spacesSleep

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.