Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42747714›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2026

Type 2-low Asthma: Epidemiology, Multiomics, and Emerging Therapies.

Philip Mendez, Alanis Rosado, Juan Carlos Cardet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip MendezDivision of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Macon and Joan Brock Virginia Health Sciences at Old Dominion University, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA. philip.mendez@chkd.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6395-7717
Alanis RosadoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
Juan Carlos CardetDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewType 2-low (T2-low) asthma, characterized by low blood and sputum eosinophils and low fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), remains a major unmet need because of frequent corticosteroid insensitivity and a lack of targeted therapies. This review summarizes recent advances in its epidemiology, multiomics, and therapeutic landscape. RECENT

findingsT2-low inflammation is highly prevalent, affecting approximately 14%-39% of adults with current asthma and up to 60% of children. Its pathogenesis reflects complex non-T2 mechanisms, including IL-17 signaling, innate immune activation through IL-1β and IL-33, and neutrophilic inflammation. Heterogeneity is further shaped by systemic factors such as obesity and immunosenescence and by environmental exposures such as ozone. Among available therapies, long-term macrolides and the anti-TSLP biologic tezepelumab have shown significant efficacy in reducing exacerbations, whereas other pathway-specific interventions have yielded inconsistent clinical benefits. Emerging metabolic approaches, including GLP-1 receptor agonists, may offer additional promise. Progress in T2-low asthma will require mechanism-based classification and clinically deployable biomarkers to align targeted therapies with specific biological drivers.

Indexed as

AsthmaEosinophilsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiomarkersHumansMultiomicsNitric OxideAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiomarkersNitric OxideBiomarkersNeutrophilic asthmaNon-eosinophilic asthmaNon-T2 asthmaT2-low asthma

Identifiers

PMID42747714
PMCPMC13582353

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.