ReviewAnatomical science international2026
Structural and functional anatomy of the superior longitudinal fasciculus: a historical and contemporary narrative review.
Review in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) is one of the major associative white matter pathways of the human brain, connecting frontal regions with parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices. Despite its central role in cognition, language, and motor functions, its structural organization and functional significance remain subjects of ongoing debate. This narrative review synthesizes historical ex vivo studies and contemporary in vivo neuroimaging data to clarify converging and conflicting descriptions of the SLF. We trace the evolution of anatomical concepts from classical dissection and histological staining to modern diffusion MRI and tractography, highlighting how methodological advances have reshaped our understanding of SLF subcomponents. Particular attention is given to the distinction between the SLF, the arcuate fasciculus, and the cingulum, which we argue reflects differing classificatory conventions and methodological choices as much as underlying anatomy, and to the nomenclatural issues addressed by the Terminologia Neuroanatomica. Functional correlates related to language, motor control, and higher cognitive processes are discussed, alongside clinical implications for neurology, psychiatry, and neurosurgery. Finally, we consider pedagogical and epistemological challenges posed by the variability of white matter anatomy and by the dependence of neuroanatomical knowledge on investigative tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42747723What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.