ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing dance learning by optimising instructional perspective: A preregistered study on the effect of dancers' viewing perspective, cognitive load and expertise.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While movement sequences in choreography are often taught through instructor demonstrations, the influence of visual perspective on learning outcomes has received limited attention. Drawing on cognitive load theory, we investigated how the requests imposed by different instructional perspectives affect learning and performance. We compared the effects of Back view (first-person), Front mirror view (third-person mirrored), and Front opposite view (third-person) between dancers. We hypothesized lower cognitive load and better performance in the Back view, particularly for less experienced dancers. After preregistering the study, 32 dancers with varying levels of experience learned a moderately complex choreography from pre-recorded videos, in the three perspectives. Five dance experts assessed movement accuracy, spatial skills, and rhythm/dynamics using a validated scoring system and a new open-source digital tool. The Back view consistently yielded superior outcomes, especially among less trained dancers. No significant differences emerged between the two third-person views, possibly due to sample size or dancer background. These findings suggest that first-person perspectives may support motor learning, with performance patterns consistent with reduced cognitive load. Practically, camera perspective should be considered in online instruction, while first-person views may benefit early in-person training. Our results highlight the role of visual perspective in learning choreography and complex motor routines, offering both theoretical and applied contributions, including validation of a novel digital assessment tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.