ArticleNursing open2026
Translation and Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire-Patient Version: A Methodological Study.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo translate, culturally adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Person-Centred Climate Questionnaire-Patient Version (PCQ-P-Tur).
designA methodological and descriptive study design.
methodsThe PCQ-P was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish, followed by content and face validity assessment. Subsequently, psychometric evaluation was conducted in a sample of 300 patients recruited from the acute care settings of a public hospital. Data were collected using a Patient Information Form, the PCQ-P-Tur and the Individualized Care Scale (ICS-Patient-B). Analyses included descriptive statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Spearman's rho correlations for concurrent validity, and reliability assessments using Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlations.
resultsExpert evaluation indicated strong content validity (I-CVI = 0.857-1.00; S-CVI = 0.969), while face validity assessment with 30 patients supported the clarity and relevance of the items. Factor analyses revealed that, unlike the original version, the PCQ-P-Tur consisted of two factors, Climate of Safety and Climate of Everydayness, forming a 16-item structure. The PCQ-P-Tur demonstrated substantial concurrent validity, with significant positive correlations between the total PCQ-P-Tur score and the total ICS-B score. Reliability was excellent, with Cronbach's α = 0.965 and item-total correlations ranging from 0.538 to 0.878. Patients reported high levels of person-centred care, with Climate of Safety and Climate of Everydayness subscales receiving the highest ratings, indicating a care climate perceived as consistently safe, supportive and aligned with person-centred principles.
conclusionThe PCQ-P-Tur is a valid and reliable scale for assessing patients' perceptions of the person-centred care climate in Turkish healthcare settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The PCQ-P-Tur can support nurses, healthcare professionals, and managers in assessing the person-centred care climate, identifying opportunities for improvement and informing quality improvement initiatives. It may also help explore how the physical and social dimensions of care climate shape patient experience and support safe, supportive and individualized patient care. IMPACT: This study addressed the lack of a Turkish instrument for assessing patients' perceptions of the person-centred care climate. The findings provide a basis for further validation and application of the PCQ-P-Tur among patients in Turkish acute care settings. REPORTING
methodThis study was reported in accordance with the COSMIN Reporting Guideline for Studies on Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: version 2.0. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient involvement beyond participation in the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.