SynthesisReviews in medical virology2026
Efficacy and Effectiveness of the Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Against Herpes Zoster, Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus, Postherpetic Neuralgia and Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herpes zoster (HZ, shingles) constitutes a significant public health concern, particularly in ageing populations, and there is growing global interest in the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) from a public health perspective. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of RZV against HZ and its complications, including a possible association with a reduced risk of dementia, among immunocompetent individuals aged 50 years and older. We synthesised the latest evidence on long-term effects, incorporating recent data from both trials and real-world effectiveness studies. A total of 27 publications based on 18 primary studies, 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 15 observational studies, were included. RZV provides very high protection against HZ in immunocompetent adults ≥ 50 years in RCTs, with approximately 95% efficacy and high certainty of evidence (CoE) according to GRADE. Observational studies also consistently indicate substantial protection, but effect estimates vary across settings (high CoE). Among vaccinated individuals who develop HZ, RZV is associated with reduced loss of quality of life and decreased analgesic use. The vaccine also substantially reduces the risk of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) (high CoE) and likely postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) (moderate CoE). Long-term follow-up suggests durable protection for at least 11 years (low CoE). RZV may be associated with a reduced risk of dementia (low CoE), due to uncertainty the true effect may be substantially different, and similar associations have been observed with other vaccines and may be confounded by healthy vaccinee bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.