Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42749787›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Prognostic determinants of overall, disease-specific and recurrence-free survival in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

Mustafa Aktaş, Senem Çengel Kurnaz, Emre Demirel, Ozan Çolak, Emel Tahir, Esra Kavaz Uştu, Mehmet Çelebi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mustafa AktaşDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey. maktas94@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4779-7582
Senem Çengel KurnazDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6552-1614
Emre DemirelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Samsun City Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-3040
Ozan ÇolakDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Çarşamba State Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1548-3426
Emel TahirDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5219-0542
Esra Kavaz UştuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6297-6012
Mehmet ÇelebiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-3338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify the independent prognostic determinants of overall, disease-specific and recurrence-free survival in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the head and neck in a single-centre cohort.

methodsEighty patients who underwent surgery for head and neck cSCC between January 2008 and January 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. The effect of clinical, surgical and pathological variables on three endpoints was assessed with univariate Cox regression. To avoid overfitting, the multivariable model for each endpoint was pre-specified with a small number of covariates scaled to the number of events. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared with the log-rank test.

resultsMean age was 71.3 years; 85% were male. Mean follow-up was 46.3 months; 47 patients died (23 from disease) and 41.2% developed recurrence. In pre-specified multivariable models, surgical margin, perineural invasion and nodal stage were independent determinants of all three endpoints. For disease-specific death, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were 4.39 (95% CI 1.77-10.86) per margin category, 5.05 (95% CI 1.99-12.79) for perineural invasion, and 2.43 (95% CI 1.48-4.00) per nodal-stage level. Older age was independent for overall survival only (aHR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03-1.09). The proportional-hazards assumption held, and on internal validation the optimism-corrected c-index remained high (0.74-0.85). Competing-risks analyses confirmed surgical margin, perineural invasion and nodal stage for disease-specific death, while perineural invasion was the most robust recurrence predictor.

conclusionSurgical margin status, perineural invasion and nodal stage were consistent, independent determinants of prognosis that identify high-risk patients; clear margins and accurate nodal assessment should be prioritised, though the retrospective design precludes causal inference.

Indexed as

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomaHead and neckLymph node metastasisPerineural invasionPrognosisSurgical margin

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.