ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
End-of-life sedation and gendered narrative registers: a longitudinal qualitative study of spouses bereaved by cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigates gendered narrative registers in spousal grief following cancer, within this sample and interview context, in palliative care settings including continuous deep sedation until death (CDSUD). It examines (1) how men and women narrate and experience bereavement and (2) how their emotional, relational, and cognitive processes evolve across the first year of bereavement (3, 6, and 12 months post-loss).
methodsThis longitudinal qualitative study is part of the AfterSedatio project. Twenty-two bereaved spouses (12 men and 10 women) were interviewed at 3 (T0), 6 (T1), and 12 months (T2) after the loss of their partner. Interviews were analyzed using ALCESTE lexical analysis, complemented by a codebook (coding reliability) thematic analysis.
resultsGendered patterns emerged across time. At T0, both men and women devoted substantial narrative space to the final days and the circumstances of the death, but in contrasting registers: women recounted these moments in sensorially detailed, emotionally embodied terms-bodily decline, acute care, and CDSUD decision-making-and framed the illness within the couple's and the family's biography, whereas men recounted the same period at greater emotional distance, in a factual register organised around clinical management, logistics, and prior family losses. At T1, the dominant classes for both genders were lexically weakly specified; within these, women's accounts more often foregrounded emotional vulnerability and intrusive end-of-life memories and men's routine disruption and relational absence. By T2, women tended to approach future planning cautiously and maintain strong emotional bonds, while men more often re-engaged in social life and personal projects. Across genders, the quality of palliative communication and clarity about sedation practices shaped grief integration. Women in this sample showed markedly higher financial vulnerability after bereavement.
conclusionWithin this sample and interview context, gender was associated with distinct narrative registers in how bereavement was narrated after cancer-related spousal loss, registers that were fluid rather than fixed. Emotional, relational, and pragmatic registers evolve, underscoring the need for individualized, gender-sensitive bereavement support. End-of-life communication, particularly around sedation, plays a critical role in later grief adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.