ArticleJournal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Association between CHA
Article in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe CHA
methodsThis study included 150 patients with sinus rhythm. They were grouped by CHA
resultsThe high-risk group had significantly lower LA reservoir strain (LASr) and LA conduit strain (LAScd) compared to the moderate- and low-risk groups (high vs. moderate vs. low: LASr, 33.2 ± 7.1 vs. 36.9 ± 6.1 vs. 40.6 ± 5.6; LAScd, 20.3 ± 5.7 vs. 23.5 ± 4.8 vs. 26.9 ± 3.9), with all P-values of < 0.01. Moderate-risk patients also showed lower strain values than low-risk patients. In contrast, LA maximal volume index did not differ among the groups (P = 0.536). Mediation analysis showed that the association between the score and LAScd was statistically mediated by left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (89.7%) with no significant direct association (P = 0.342). For LASr, 62.4% of the association was statistically mediated by LV diastolic dysfunction, with a residual direct statistical association remaining (β = -0.139, P = 0.008).
conclusionsIncreased CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.