ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2026
A multidisciplinary program for meningioma treatment, research, and support services.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Standard treatments for meningioma include surgery and radiotherapy, but the timing and technical details of these treatments are debated, particularly as advances in meningioma biology expand options for treatment. Patients with meningioma may experience adverse quality-of-life and neurocognitive sequelae following diagnosis and treatment, and survivorship resources for these patients are limited. Methods: We initiated a Multidisciplinary Meningioma Program (MMP) to advance the care of patients at our institution in September 2024. The MMP consists of synergistic clinical, scientific, and survivorship resources, including a weekly tumor board and multidisciplinary clinic, clinical trials and prospective registries for translational research, a meningioma-specific support group, and basic and translational research. In this article, we describe the implementation and initial patient-facing aspects of the MMP. Results: In the first 15 months of the MMP, 602 cases were discussed at the MMP tumor board, and 142 patients were seen in consultation in the MMP multidisciplinary clinic. Twelve percent of patients discussed in the MMP tumor board were offered clinical trial enrollment, and 84% were offered prospective registry enrollment. Participants in the MMP support group cited informational and emotional benefits. Following implementation of the MMP, the clinical volume of consultations for meningioma increased by 87.0%-533.3%, and the volume of treatments increased by 42.1%-115.2% across clinical departments. Conclusions: Through creation of a multidisciplinary program for meningioma treatment, research, and support services, we enabled consensus clinical recommendations, streamlined enrollment on clinical trials and prospective registries, improved access to support services, and increased patient volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.