ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence reports2026
Co-treating opioid and alcohol use disorders in the United States, 1960-2026: A historical policy review in the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) era.
Review in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This narrative review reconstructs the U.S. history of treating co-occurring opioid use disorder (OUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) from the rise of methadone maintenance in the 1960s through contemporary interest in immunometabolic mechanisms and repurposed therapies. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature and selected grey sources, we trace four eras including early single-substance paradigms and maintenance; federally regulated opioid treatment programs and the broader medicalization of addiction care; recognition of co-occurring disorders, parity and Affordable Care Act reforms, and uneven diffusion of medications for OUD and AUD; and a renewed metabolic framing, including preclinical, clinical, and real-world evaluation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Across eras, regulation, reimbursement, and professional authority shaped access as much as evidence, producing persistent geographic and socioeconomic inequities. Emerging GLP-1-based therapies may offer a distinctive cross-disorder adjunct, but their value for OUD/AUD remains unproven. Population benefit will require rigorous trials and delivery reforms that expand equitable access to integrated care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.