Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42750843›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence reports2026

Co-treating opioid and alcohol use disorders in the United States, 1960-2026: A historical policy review in the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) era.

Fares Qeadan, William A Barbeau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fares QeadanParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
William A BarbeauParkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, 2160 S 1st Ave, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

Funding

Advancing Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders: A Comprehensive Analysis of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Traditional Pharmacotherapies in Real-World SettingsR01AA031890 · NIAAA · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI Fares Qeadan · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA031890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review reconstructs the U.S. history of treating co-occurring opioid use disorder (OUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) from the rise of methadone maintenance in the 1960s through contemporary interest in immunometabolic mechanisms and repurposed therapies. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature and selected grey sources, we trace four eras including early single-substance paradigms and maintenance; federally regulated opioid treatment programs and the broader medicalization of addiction care; recognition of co-occurring disorders, parity and Affordable Care Act reforms, and uneven diffusion of medications for OUD and AUD; and a renewed metabolic framing, including preclinical, clinical, and real-world evaluation of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Across eras, regulation, reimbursement, and professional authority shaped access as much as evidence, producing persistent geographic and socioeconomic inequities. Emerging GLP-1-based therapies may offer a distinctive cross-disorder adjunct, but their value for OUD/AUD remains unproven. Population benefit will require rigorous trials and delivery reforms that expand equitable access to integrated care.

Indexed as

Alcohol use disorderBuprenorphineGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistsIntegrated treatmentMethadoneNaltrexoneOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID42750843
PMCPMC13578398

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.