ArticleClinical interventions in aging2026
Identifying Patient Portal Messages from Care Partners of People with Dementia.
Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patient portals provide a centralized platform for accessing health information and communicating with healthcare providers, offering benefits for care partners of people with dementia. However, uptake of shared proxy access remains limited, with many care partners informally using patient credentials. This study aimed to identify portal messages sent from care partners of people with dementia and describe associated portal use. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Colorado involving N=521 people with dementia ≥60 years. Data extracted from electronic health records included standardized contact information and unstructured portal messages. Names of potential care partners, termed here "known contacts", were identified through structured fields (emergency contacts, patient contacts, healthcare proxies). A rules-based approach was developed to identify messages from known contacts and validated through manual review. Messages were linked to portal activities performed the same day to describe patterns of use. Results: Among the cohort (N=521), 402 (77%) people with dementia had messages sent on their behalf from a known contact, predominantly children and spouses. Known contacts sent a mean of 13.7 messages. Of all threads, 7% were from proxy accounts; 53% of messages did not identify a known contact, and 40% did. 67% of the cohort had portal activity on the same day as a known contact message. Known contacts more often accessed "Visits and appointments" and less often "Medications" after sending messages. Conclusion: Known contacts may use patients' portal accounts for broader care management beyond messaging. Identifying known contact portal use could ultimately help health systems to recognize care partners, provide timely support, improve portal privacy and accuracy, and facilitate formal proxy registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.