ReviewDigital discovery2026
Bridging data and theory: hybrid modelling for pharmaceutical crystallisation process development.
Review in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crystallisation remains a critical unit operation in pharmaceutical manufacturing, yet process development is often constrained by empirical approaches and data limitations. Mechanistic models such as population balance frameworks provide physical interpretability but require extensive parameterisation and struggle with complex, multiscale phenomena. Data-driven machine learning models offer strong predictive performance but lack transparency, limiting regulatory acceptance. Hybrid modelling, which integrates mechanistic theory with data-driven components, has emerged as a promising strategy to address these limitations. This review surveys the current modelling landscape and critically assesses recent case studies across batch cooling, antisolvent, and continuous crystallisation modes, covering population balance and machine learning combinations. Key open problems are identified, including the absence of agreed modelling and experimental design frameworks, data sparsity, poor scale-up transferability, unresolved regulatory requirements around uncertainty quantification and model. Practical technical recommendations and a proposed workflow are provided to guide future work, with the aim of moving the field beyond isolated case studies toward predictive, explainable, deployable and published crystallisation process development.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.