ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2026
Nano-RAPID: Integrated Diagnosis for Sarcoma Using a Nanopore Sequencer.
Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathological diagnosis of sarcoma is challenging. Although high-throughput sequencing and methylation array aid sarcoma diagnosis and are routine in high-income countries, access to these genetic/epigenetic analyses in many countries, including Japan, remains limited. Nanopore sequencing is an easy, fast, and cost-effective high-throughput sequencing alternative. Nanopore sequencers read long-read DNA to detect fusion DNA and 5-methyl-cytosine in single nucleotide resolution, enabling real-time basecalling for selective enrichment of regions of interest via "adaptive sampling." Nanopore sequencing of Raw DNA with Adaptive sampling for Prompt Integrated Diagnosis (Nano-RAPID) was developed to test its diagnostic utility. This study included 22 retrospective and nine prospective cases. DNA extracted from fresh/frozen tissue was sequenced for 46-98 h, followed by approximately 12 h of data analysis. Consequently, disease-specific/characteristic fusion genes were detected in 10 retrospective and six prospective cases. Disease-specific single nucleotide variants were detected in three cases, while disease-specific amplifications were detected in two retrospective cases. Monosomy, trisomy, and chromosomal instability were also detected. Methylation analyses accurately classified 15 retrospective and five prospective cases. Collectively, correct tumor types were identified using at least one modality in 19 retrospective and nine prospective cases. Halving the consumables and re-analyzing 24-h data yielded nearly equivalent results, suggesting faster and cost-effective analyses. In conclusion, Nano-RAPID may be a promising adjunctive for sarcoma diagnosis. Nano-RAPID could be introduced in low-equipped hospitals to assist non-specialized pathologists diagnosing sarcoma. Since this study remains exploratory, further studies with larger cohort should be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.