Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42753014›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Endocrine and surgical outcomes after medial cavernous sinus wall resection for functioning pituitary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luis O Vargas, Vratko Himic, Vagif Kazimli, Adonicah Cummings, Daniel Kreatsoulas, Arman Jahangiri, Daniel M Aaronson, Ashish H Shah, Ricardo J Komotar, Michael E Ivan and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luis O Vargas *Department of Neurosurgery, University of Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Vratko Himic *Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. vxh268@miami.edu.
Vagif KazimliDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Adonicah CummingsDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Daniel KreatsoulasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Arman JahangiriDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Daniel M AaronsonDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ashish H ShahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ricardo J KomotarDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Michael E IvanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Zachary C GerseyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functioning pituitary adenomas (FPAs) require both cytoreduction and durable endocrinological remission (ER), which is often limited by occult invasion of the medial cavernous sinus wall. Selective medial cavernous sinus wall resection (MCSWR) has emerged as a targeted approach, but its endocrine benefits and safety profile remain incompletely understood. We synthesize syndrome-specific remission, resection, recurrence, and complication rates after MCSWR in adults with FPAs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase through 2025, including adults with GH-, ACTH-, and prolactin-secreting adenomas who underwent intentional medial cavernous sinus wall resection as described by the original studies and had at least one postoperative endocrine outcome. Two reviewers extracted study- and tumor-level data on resection, ER, recurrence, and complications. Pooled event rates were estimated with random-effects models. Thirteen studies (11 retrospective, 2 prospective) involving 493 patients met inclusion criteria. Among 344 patients with available endocrine follow-up, pooled ER was 85% (95% CI:77-91%), and gross total resection (GTR) was 92% (95% CI:81-97%). Recurrence occurred in 6% (95% CI:3-13%). Subgroup ER rates were 87% for acromegaly, 89% for Cushing's disease, and 78% for prolactinomas, with corresponding GTR rates of 95%, 91%, and 80%. Complications were rare: ICA injury 0%, cranial nerve III and VI palsies 3% each, and postoperative CSF leak 4%. Most studies had a serious or critical risk of bias, mainly due to confounding and single-arm designs. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 30 months in contributing cohorts, with earlier series reporting ranges up to 1-49 months. MCSWR was associated with high reported ER and GTR rates, low reported recurrence, and acceptable morbidity in carefully selected patients with FPAs, particularly somatotroph and corticotroph tumors. However, the evidence mainly comes from high-volume centers and non-comparative series with limited follow-up, highlighting the need for prospective, multicenter studies with standardized endocrine endpoints, histological confirmation, and long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

AdenomaCavernous SinusNeurosurgical ProceduresPituitary NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeBiochemical remissionEndoscopic endonasal surgeryFunctioning pituitary adenomaGross total resectionMedial cavernous sinus wall resectionSkull base surgery

Identifiers

PMID42753014
PMCPMC13586054

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.