ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Synaptic mitochondrial dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability of AD treatments targeting classic pathological proteins to achieve meaningful clinical outcomes has been severely limited, shifting attention to the earlier upstream pathways that drive disease progression. Increasing evidence indicates that synaptic mitochondrial dysfunction is an early pathological event that directly contributes to synaptic loss and cognitive decline. This review focuses on how four interrelated pathologies-disrupted energy metabolism, calcium overload, imbalanced mitochondrial fission/fusion, and defective autophagy-converge to impair synaptic function and plasticity. Emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at protecting and restoring synaptic mitochondrial health, including mitochondria-targeted antioxidants, metabolic modulators, calcium signaling inhibitors, dynamics regulators, and autophagy inducers, are also examined. A central focus of the review is clinical translation: we summarize the preclinical evidence and critically evaluate major obstacles such as the lack of synapse-specific biomarkers, challenges in blood-brain barrier penetration and targeted delivery, and substantial patient heterogeneity. Rather than proposing a fully defined translational framework, we highlight the essential requirements for building one, centered on synaptic mitochondrial bioenergetics and quality control. Specifically, early and accurate biomarkers must be developed, patients should be stratified promptly, and rational combination therapies with complementary mechanisms need to be implemented. This organelle-centered perspective will clarify AD pathogenesis and help guide the development of next-generation neuroprotective therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.