ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Interpretable machine learning-based prediction of 90-day mortality after endovascular treatment in acute large vessel occlusion stroke.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite high recanalization rates after endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO), 15%-20% of patients still die within 90 days. Existing prognostic models predominantly target functional disability rather than mortality, and rarely incorporate calibration, clinical utility, or interpretability. We aimed to develop and internally validate interpretable machine learning (ML) models for dynamic post-EVT in-hospital prediction of 90-day all-cause mortality in AIS-LVO patients with successful recanalization. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 449 AIS-LVO patients with successful EVT (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b-3) at a nationally certified Advanced Stroke Center in Guangxi, southwestern China, between January 2022 and May 2025. Candidate predictors included baseline characteristics, admission laboratory indicators, procedural variables, and post-procedural complications available during hospitalization. Patients were randomly split 8:2 into training ( Results: The 90-day mortality rate was 19.6% (88/449). Random Forest achieved favorable overall test-set performance (AUC = 0.806; Brier score = 0.128; Hosmer-Lemeshow Conclusions: A Random Forest-based ML model with an online calculator and SHAP-based interpretability supports dynamic in-hospital post-EVT mortality risk stratification, with complication predictors incorporated only after they clinically occur. Prospective external validation in geographically diverse multicenter cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.