Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755595›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Cubes and playdough are feasible and acceptable methods to estimate food group intake with the Global Diet Quality Score app.

Marieke Vossenaar, Mourad Moursi, Luka Pauwelyn, Joanne E Arsenault, Winnie Bell, Megan Deitchler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marieke VossenaarIntake-Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI 360, Washington, DC, United States.
Mourad MoursiIntake-Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI 360, Washington, DC, United States.
Luka PauwelynFHI 360, Washington, DC, United States.
Joanne E ArsenaultIntake-Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI 360, Washington, DC, United States.
Winnie BellIntake-Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI 360, Washington, DC, United States.
Megan DeitchlerIntake-Center for Dietary Assessment, FHI 360, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-035380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Global Diet Quality Score application (GDQS app) enables standardized collection of dietary data across settings. The GDQS app allows for the use of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed cubes and playdough to estimate the amounts of food groups consumed for a 24-h reference period. This paper reports on the feasibility and acceptability of using a set of ten 3D cubes and playdough to estimate amounts consumed at the food group level among study participants. Methods: Enumerators conducted face-to-face interviews using the GDQS app with 170 study participants (71% female; aged 18-73 years) living in the Washington DC metropolitan area. The participants reported their consumption for the prior 24-h and used 3D cubes and playdough to estimate the amount of each food group consumed. The order in which participants were offered the cubes and playdough was randomized. Respondent feedback on use of the 3D cubes and playdough was collected through a 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions. Results: Fewer than 2% of the study participants described either the cube or playdough method as 'very difficult'. There was no statistically significant difference in preference between the two methods (45% preferred cubes and 55% preferred playdough, Conclusion: Both 3D cubes and playdough are feasible and acceptable methods for estimating GDQS food group intake, strengthening the evidence for the practicality of using the GDQS app for dietary data collection. Given the high acceptability of both methods, the choice of method-or the use of both in combination-for data collection should be guided by the operational context and resource availability. These findings reinforce the value of simplified, standardized tools for assessing diet quality across diverse field settings.

Indexed as

3D cubesdiet qualityfood group consumptionGlobal Diet Quality Score (GDQS) appplaydough

Identifiers

PMID42755595
PMCPMC13581631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.