ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Reframing trauma recovery for public health: introducing the recovery assemblage framework.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological trauma represents a major global health challenge, with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) contributing to long-term difficulties in mental and physical health, relationships, and wellbeing. Despite this, dominant models of trauma recovery are largely grounded in biomedical and individualized paradigms, and prioritize linear pathways focused on symptom reduction and therapeutic outcomes. Such approaches risk locating responsibility for recovery within the individual, overlooking the broader social, relational, and structural conditions that shape how recovery is understood and practiced. In this paper, we introduce the Recovery Assemblage Framework for Trauma (RAF-T), a conceptual framework empirically informed by a feminist participatory action research study with adult survivors of childhood trauma conducted within UK community-based trauma recovery contexts. Drawing on feminist new materialism, posthuman ethics, and affective pedagogy, RAF-T reconceptualises recovery as dynamic, relational and contextually embedded, shaped through relations among bodies, lived experience, relationships, material conditions, environments, institutions, time, and wider social conditions. Rather than conceptualizing recovery through discrete domains, stages, principles, or resources, RAF-T facilitates reflection on how multiple influences become entangled and how their changing configurations may enable, constrain, or reshape possibilities for recovery within particular contexts. RAF-T therefore positions trauma recovery not solely as an individual or clinical endeavor, but as a population health concern shaped through communities, services, systems, and everyday environments. While grounded in this empirical context, RAF-T has potential relevance across wider trauma contexts; however, further research is needed to examine its applicability across different populations, cultural settings, and health systems. We discuss implications of RAF-T for public mental health, research and practice to facilitate a more relational, material, contextual, and systems-orientated understanding of trauma recovery. RAF-T offers a novel conceptual resource for exploring trauma recovery as a population health concern while remaining open to further empirical refinement and examination across different contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.