ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Water awareness and bioethical perspectives among medical students at Mersin University Faculty of Medicine: an analytical cross-sectional study comparing academic-stage groups.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The escalating environmental crisis underscores water as a vital bioethical responsibility and public health determinant. Accordingly, water consumption, sustainability, and related ethical responsibilities are relevant topics in medical education. Objective: This study aimed to compare water-consumption behaviours, awareness, knowledge, and attitudes toward water use and water-related ethics between Year 3 and Year 6 medical students. Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted at Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Türkiye, and compared two independent cohorts of medical students (Year 3 and Year 6) to evaluate their knowledge and attitudes toward water consumption from a bioethical perspective. The findings therefore represent cross-sectional associations between academic stage and the measured outcomes in two independent cohorts. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire incorporating the Water Consumption Behaviour Scale. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and independent-samples t-tests were used for the analyses. Results: A total of 246 medical students participated in the study. Correct-response rates were higher among Year 6 students than Year 3 students for recommended daily water intake (26.3% vs. 7.4%, Conclusion: Academic stage was associated with distinct patterns of water-related knowledge and scale scores. Year 6 students had higher correct-response rates for two knowledge items, whereas Year 3 students had a higher total Water Consumption Behaviour Scale score. These findings represent cross-sectional associations between academic stage and the measured outcomes in two independent cohorts. The observed patterns identify water ethics, planetary health, and sustainability as relevant topics for medical curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.